scroll icon
Scroll to see our services

Company Updates

What 159 staffing agencies told us about recruitment software ROI

Josh Kirkham, VP of Operations

Last updated:

April 2026

Read time:

8

mins

What 159 staffing agencies told us about recruitment software ROI

recruitment software for staffing agencies ROI survey

Hey CoRecruiters! 

It's been a busy, busy time for everyone in the recruitment industry — and we wanted to know how it's playing out on your desks. So in late 2025, we surveyed 159 recruiters and agency owners to measure the real impact CoRecruit is having.

The survey results are out, and we absolutely love them! 

Here's everything we found.

1. Recruiters are drowning in admin. And they know it

Before CoRecruit, the majority of our users were spending 20 to 30+ minutes preparing a single candidate submittal. Every. Single. One.

Think about what that means at scale. Ten submittals a week? That's up to five hours gone. Not on sourcing, not on client calls, not on strategy. On formatting notes and filling in fields.

After CoRecruit, that same submittal takes under ten minutes. Most users are getting it done in under five.

That's a 75% reduction in time per candidate. We love it! 

2. The time savings are real, and they're significant

how do direct placement firms guarantee quality

73% of our users are saving four or more hours every week.

Let me break that down further:

  • 36% save 4–6 hours a week
  • 18% save 7–10 hours a week
  • 19% (our power users) save 10+ hours a week

Only 27% are in the 1–3 hour range. The majority are getting back nearly a full working day every week.

3. So what are these recruiters doing with that time?

This is the part I find most compelling, and most telling about the recruiters who use this tool well.

When we asked users what they do with their recovered hours, the top three answers were:

  1. Building stronger client relationships (cited by ~70% of respondents)
  2. Sourcing more candidates (~65%)
  3. More strategic or revenue-generating tasks ( ~55%)

Nobody said they were using the time to do more admin. Nobody said they were just leaving early (though honestly, fair enough).

The best recruiters are immediately reinvesting saved time into the things that grow a business, their business relationships, the pipeline, and everything else that plays a huge role in their agency’s growth.

That's the compounding effect that doesn't show up in a single survey, but it will show up in revenue over the next 12 months.

4. The business impact numbers are honest

I'm going to be straight with you here, because I think honesty is more useful than spin.

36% of users reported increased placements per month. 34% reported increased revenue per recruiter. The rest reported no change or were unsure.

Does that mean CoRecruit isn't driving revenue? No. It means revenue is a lagging indicator.

When a recruiter saves four hours a week and reinvests that time into client relationships and sourcing, the placement impact takes months to compound. The efficiency gain is immediate. The revenue follows.

What is showing up right now: ~40% of users reported an increase in call volume per recruiter. That's the leading indicator. The revenue follows.

5. The AI notetaker is non-negotiable

95%+ of respondents listed the AI Notetaker as their most important feature.

Not a nice-to-have. The anchor of the product.

Why? Because 81% of users rated CoRecruit's impact on candidate experience as 8/10 or higher. 

And when we dug into the qualitative data, the reason was consistent: recruiters are finally able to maintain eye contact during interviews. They're listening and they’re actually listening, not half-typing and half-nodding.

That changes the quality of the conversation. It changes the candidate's perception of the agency. And it changes the data that ends up in the CRM — because notes taken by someone paying full attention are better than notes taken by someone trying to multitask.

6. The satisfaction numbers speak for themselves

recruitment software reviews

Average NPS: 8.8 out of 10.

68% of users are Promoters. The kind of satisfaction that leads to referrals and case studies and unprompted LinkedIn posts. 21% are Passives. 11% are Detractors, and their feedback was almost entirely about mobile limitations and AI voice calibration, which are things we're actively working on.

The satisfaction is high. And it's coming disproportionately from agency owners and partners (~45% of respondents), the people who see the efficiency gains hitting their bottom line directly.

What this tells us about where recruiting is going

Here's my read on all of this:

The agencies that win over the next three years will be the ones that get the most out of the people they already have.

The admin burden that's been baked into recruiting for decades (the note-taking, the CRM updates, the submittal formatting) is not a cost of doing business anymore. It's a choice. And increasingly, it's a competitive disadvantage.

Our users are choosing differently, and we’re thrilled to make that happen. 

CoRecruit conducted this survey across 159 users in 2 months. Respondents included agency owners, recruiters, directors, and team leads across staffing and executive search.

Table of Contents

Frequently asked questions

What's the best recruitment software for small staffing agencies?

CoRecruit is built specifically for agency recruiters — it captures calls, automates notes, and syncs structured data to your ATS. It's used by small and mid-size staffing agencies that need to cut admin time without adding headcount.

What software do recruitment agencies use?

Most agencies run an ATS (like Bullhorn, Vincere, or JobAdder) alongside a calling tool. CoRecruit sits on top of that stack — it records and transcribes calls, then pushes clean structured notes directly into your ATS.

How does AI streamline recruitment for agencies?

The biggest impact is on admin. AI notetaking eliminates manual note-taking during calls, auto-fills candidate submittals, and keeps your ATS data clean — so recruiters spend time on placements, not formatting.